film project, Beauty will save the
World, sounds like a fun project. To make a project successful for any
identified goal, all identifiable contradictions must be resolved.
a contradiction in a project is
identified, most people who create projects ignore the contradiction,
attempt to encourage the project with other words about other things.
the contradiction is therefore not
resolved, and will later defeat the project. Even one contradiction
place will defeat even empires.
project is poorly explained, with
vague words about how good the project is, rather than precisely what
do and how it will do that. Therefore it will not interest people who
word, "Beauty" does not
interest half the people in the world, especially when combined with
"save the world". Therefore the title defeats the project for half
the people. What is beautiful to some people is not beautiful to
others. If the
word "beauty" does not have a precise meaning among many people, and
you want a precise goal, then do not use that word because different
will be created. Many people believe they are already saving the world
starting wars against those other people who are threatening the world.
Therefore the words fail the project.
the project should be
described in precise words about what it will do, not with vague
is a list of contradictions that
can be identified in the description of the project, which should have
resolved before the project was described. If a person starts a project
they ask and answer all the questions about the project, they may have
the initially described goal will not be achieved.
the CONTROLLING CONTRADICTION of
the project is that it attempts to educate or convince many people that
should do something different from what they are doing. The process of
educating people to stop creating contradictions has failed for
years, for a reason the project does not identify, but is available.
Larisa has not resolved the contradictions of her own project, is the
reason the war-makers have not resolved the contradictions of their war
Larisa resolved her own
contradictions, she would learn how the human mind identifies and
contradictions, to therefore know how to do so in any human mind,
minds of the war makers.
she does not learn that knowledge,
her film will not display that knowledge.
must go back to work at the floating
on having fun.
refutation by Dr. Uladzimir Tratsiakou to Doug BUCHANAN reply on the
you see, your way how to reveal
contradictions asking questions and then answering them has the old
pre-history, because Socrates showed more than 2 thousand years ago
of his dialogues how the truth might be revealed, when he founded
contradictions within his opponent's statements. You propose to act as
to yourself, revealing contradictions within your own statements. For
are needed to think in your own way and as if being another, to be
to be another, i.e. to imagine you speaks to an opponent, who is
you and correcting you. But to be another, to see yourself from aside,
evaluate yourself and your own thoughts AS IF WITH HELP OF ANOTHER
is hard and ambiguous occupation, that is why your way being IMPLICITLY
dialogical one is losing in effectiveness to EXPLICITLY dialogical
way for to reveal the truth.
I've revealed contradiction of
your technology: you applied it as a monological asking-answering way
implicitly dialogical one.
is seen from the next your statement: "To make a project successful for
any identified goal, all identifiable contradictions must be resolved".
First, you haven’t to mean a projecting person only, looking for
in the person's thinking, because a project may be applied by a group
projecting people, who were sharpening formulations and exposing
while discussing one with another. I.e. they were conducting a
condition, above which you
counted as necessary one for a project to be successful, doesn't be the
You, in particular, didn’t take into consideration the project's price
For example, Egyptian pyramids in result were successful projects, but
successes were reached by price of hundreds thousand slaves' life’s.
'Belomor-canal' project in Russia was successful as well -- by price of
millions prisoners' life’s. So, your condition is not necessary, and
project, not answering it, entirely may be successful.
you can't admit that any
magnate-billionaire will see or even has seen already how insecure is
business in the world going to down, and will get ready to respond to
appeal to change something to a better using mighty means of cinema art
invest a little part of his capital, even without hope of its full
reimbursement? Larisa after all is proposes just this and hopes for
appeared to misunderstand Larisa
project's idea, what is seen from your assertion: "If she does not
that knowledge, her film will not display that knowledge". After "The
beauty will save the world" project (BWSW), it is proposed not the only
Larisa is creating any one film; the project gives
organization-subject-financial framework for scenario writers, actors,
film-directors and other stage-managers to reveal them their creative
and proposes to produce not one but 12 films, 10 of which being fiction
Only having no notion on films' production, one may be agree with your
prediction: "But the contradiction is therefore not resolved, and will
later defeat the project". The way from a film plan to its embodiment
very complex and may not be defined and scheduled from the beginning to
end, even if because just mutual contradictions between actors, film
stage-designers are one of the main forces moving the very process of a
I am agree that contradictions
accumulated of not-resolved problems may destruct whole empire, but I
believe that ONE contradiction may cope with that. Inside a complex
a social organism, the very contradictoriness of various social
"organs" и "tissues" is moving force of development,
and MASSE of not-resolved contradictions-problems only can ruin an
last of known cases in the history, empire of Soviet, 7 decades holding
just the same case.
believe that the CONTROLLING
CONTRADICTION of the project is attempt "to educate or convince many
people that they should do something different from what they are
But humankind's degradation is going really, and even if the
re-building of the
human mentality and social consciousness would need thousands years,
should begin the process.
assertion may be disproved by
a single example. Such the example is drastic changes of human
gone on in my life duration. More than 70 years people in the USSR were
educated in the spirit of collectivism and contempt for the personal
private for the sake of the collective, getting used to social
poverty. And now, only about 1.5 decade after Soviet power, in Russia
Soviet republics, valuables of liberal freedoms and self-value of human
personality are quite felt. To that, for Russia, declare coefficient
of 10% of the richest to that of 10% of the most poor) has got more
some countries of "the first world".
the appeal to act for the
sake the human race's safe is justified because of the near, predicated
catastrophes. In our joint Declaration, of both Mission Studio and
aiming to get maintenance of the public opinion, of top figures of arts
science, the ground of IMPERATIVE NECESSITY to act just now will be
the means of the most popular of the arts, cinema art, to try to make
change to the better in the social consciousness, having created films
might cause wish for revision and revaluation of people's life’s, make
realizing their place in the world, provide positive-creative life
elaboration. As I can see, such understanding of "beauty of the life"
appears out of your field of attention. Proposed you correlated your
of the beauty with art works and consumer things only, otherwise you
say: "What is beautiful to some people is not beautiful to others".
For all that, there is general apprehension of the most people, what is
beautiful and bad/ugly even if concerning friendship, love, business
interrelations between people.
opinion is: "the project should be described in precise words about
it will do, not with vague descriptions". But this recommendation is
not for the most creative part of intelligentsia. The project expresses
SOCIAL ORDER which may be apprehended by people of the arts first of
those, who would want themselves to have created something similar but
means to realize their ideas. More exact project's formulations aren't
binding initiatives of film directors, cameramen and other filmmakers.
is not truth that the very name "BWSW" may "defeat the project
for half the people", moreover, the half the people lost aren't needed
realize the project.
going without saying that Larisa
as a project manager must not resolve any her own contradictions as for
"learn how the human mind identifies and resolves contradictions". If
film creators will get creative liberty of acting and necessary
human, financial and material resources, they cope themselves better
problems and contradictions. Too reglamented project would be able to
artisan’s only, not gifted authors, actors, and film directors.
sum up. Doug, I think you, as having
clear thinking, have voiced explicitly what negative relation to the
like of replying "on the sound", not the essence, Larisa and me might
wait, giving us a possibility to be prepared to objections of like
don't know else how think my colleague, but I am thankful you for that.